A shocking revelation: Arman Tsarukyan, a top contender in the UFC lightweight division, was reportedly told he was deemed 'too dangerous' to headline the debut Paramount+ card. This decision has sparked controversy among fans and raises questions about the promotion's priorities. Let's dive deeper into this unexpected turn of events.
Fans were left puzzled and frustrated when the UFC chose a different main event for its inaugural 2026 event on Paramount+. The spotlight will instead shine on Paddy Pimblett versus Justin Gaethje for an interim lightweight title at UFC 324. This decision left many questioning why Tsarukyan, who boasts a strong winning streak and top contender status, was overlooked.
While many expected an outcry from Tsarukyan, his reaction has been surprisingly measured. But here's where it gets controversial... his own actions might have played a role in this decision.
The UFC's Concerns:
The UFC's decision seems to stem from Tsarukyan's behavior. Before his recent setback, he was in the bad books of Dana White. Tsarukyan's past incidents, including punching a fan at UFC 300 and a headbutt incident with Dan Hooker before UFC Qatar, were cited as reasons for the snub.
During a recent Kick stream with Adin Ross, Tsarukyan revealed the UFC's reasoning. He was informed that he was considered 'too dangerous' to be featured on the debut Paramount card, due to these incidents.
"I was supposed to fight for the title and then they said, ‘You are dangerous to push you on the first card on Paramount.’
“Because of the headbutt, pullout, (punching) fan. That’s why they said, ‘You’ve gotta wait.’ And I said okay. What can I do?
“I’ll just wait and I know my belt is not gonna be like — it’s gonna be mine. I work everyday because of that,” he concluded.
What's Next for Tsarukyan?
With his next UFC move uncertain, Tsarukyan is staying active in the grappling world. He's preparing for a Real American Freestyle debut against Lance Palmer and is also pushing for a grappling match against Dustin Poirier in February. Negotiations are underway, with Hype FC CEO Armand Martirosian hinting at the potential bout. If the Poirier match doesn't materialize, another exciting return could be in the cards, but the details remain under wraps.
The Big Question: Is the UFC's decision to sideline Tsarukyan justified, considering his actions? Or is this a case of the promotion prioritizing marketability over merit? And this is the part most people miss... Does this set a precedent for how the UFC handles its rising stars? What are your thoughts? Share your opinions in the comments below!
How do you think a grappling match between Dustin Poirier and Arman Tsarukyan would play out? 🤼
👇 Join the debate; share your insight. Use the comment button on the bottom left to have your say
